(cover image by Rawpixel)

I’m sure both of my readers are tired of hearing me pontificate and reminisce about the blog every time we hit a milestone, like 900 posts, or 600 pieces of music, or a million words, all relatively recent achievements, but here’s one that will apparently only come around every four or five years. We’re adding a digit to the total number of posts, from 999, with this post, to 1,000.

It doesn’t really mean much, honestly. No one else in the world would know if I hadn’t written this article, and broadly speaking, even though I did, still no one will know. But in the quality vs. quantity debate, that four-digit number says I have at least one of those, even if probably not the other.

When I started writing this blog, it was not my intention to aspire to elucidate the finer points of how Beethoven navigated through a sonata-form movement or rondo form in a sonata or concerto or symphony, or what sleight of hand Brahms uses to introduce themes, change keys and take us somewhere we didn’t expect, or try to convey how Webern or Schoenberg (or, terrifyingly, Boulez or Babbitt) uses serial methods to achieve unity and structure in a piece. However, in writing these 1,000 posts, I’ve found myself trying to do just that, and often rather poorly.

There’s a balance to be had, though. What is the average listener (this sentence could stop right here with a question mark) listening for? What does he want to hear? For the majority of listeners, especially those without any kind of musical training or education, it’s about emotion, beauty, etc. But there’s an underlying, very technical layer there that gives you rewards and insights commiserate with the effort you put into learning about it.

I’ve clearly opted for quantity over quality, but I’d give myself at least the credit to say that I’ve learned a lot, and have gotten better with handling some of the finer points. There’s no mission statement or resolution or anything to pass here, save to acknowledge 1,000 posts. We’ll reach 700 pieces of music in the fall, and I already have no. 700 picked out, and maybe even 800, but that’ll be sometime in the spring of ’19, if we’re all still here by that time.

So that’s all, just a small article to say thank you to all three of you for reading however much or little you do, and leaving comments and all that. I enjoy writing here much more than you may realize, and I hope that you enjoy reading it even just a fraction as much as I enjoy writing it. Stay tuned for more of my words. Thank you.


2 thoughts on “1000

  1. Yes, it does mean a lot to you and it should. You’ve demonstrated dedication, a lot of it, and you have demonstrated the willingness to invest time and other resources into something without caring too much about any potential return. You have shared without asking if anyone looks for what you have been sharing. You have been sharing with us you passion for music, your pleasure of writing, you have been sharing with us your time. Thank you. I appreciate. 1000 posts on classical music and sometimes obscure, forgotten composers – that’s quite something to be proud of. 🥇

  2. I, for one, think this is worthy of celebration. Writing is very enriching, and the great thing about writing on the interwebs is, members of your audience might still be just now learning the alphabet. Your wrong lingers. You never know who may benefit from what you’ve amassed here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s